When President Donald Trump and Elon Musk fed the US Company for Worldwide Growth into the wooden chipper earlier this 12 months, one of many lesser-known casualties was the shutdown of an obscure however essential program that tracked public well being data on about half of the world’s nations.
For practically 40 years, the Demographic and Well being Surveys (DHS) Program has served because the world’s well being report card. In that point, it has carried out over 400 nationally consultant surveys in additional than 90 international locations, capturing a variety of important indicators equivalent to maternal and little one well being, vitamin, schooling ranges, entry to water and sanitation, and the prevalence of ailments like HIV and malaria.
Taken collectively, it provided maybe the clearest image ever compiled of world well being.
And that readability got here from how rigorous these surveys have been. Every one began with a globally vetted blueprint of questions, utilized by a whole lot of skilled native surveyors who went door-to-door, conducting face-to-face interviews in individuals’s houses. The ultimate, anonymized knowledge was then processed by a single contractor ICF Worldwide, a personal consulting agency primarily based in Reston, Virginia, which made the outcomes standardized and comparable throughout international locations and over time. Its knowledge powered world estimates from establishments just like the Institute for Well being Metrics and Analysis, which in flip formed public well being coverage, analysis, and funding selections around the globe. “If DHS didn’t exist, evaluating anemia throughout international locations can be a PhD thesis,” mentioned Doug Johnson, a senior statistician on the nonprofit IDinsight.
Crucially, DHS additionally tracked issues few different techniques touched, like gender-based violence, girls’s autonomy, and attitudes towards home abuse. Physician’s workplaces aren’t consultant and solely seize people who can entry a proper well being care system. Additionally, since DHS knowledge is anonymized, not like a police report, responders don’t must concern intervention in the event that they don’t need it. “You possibly can’t get solutions from different sources to delicate questions like those DHS posed,” mentioned Haoyi Chen from the UN Statistics Division, pointing to 1 instance: Is a husband justified in beating his spouse if she burns the meals?
Then, earlier this 12 months, DHS was shut down.
The choice got here as a part of the Rescissions Act of 2025, a invoice handed in June that clawed again $9.4 billion from overseas assist and different applications. Eliminating DHS saved the federal government some $47 million a 12 months — solely about 0.1 % of the whole US assist funds, or half the price of a single F-35 fighter jet.
That tiny funds lower has had fast penalties. The transfer halted round 24 in-progress nation surveys – 10 of which have been simply wanting last publication, and three in Ethiopia, Guinea, and Uganda that have been stopped mid-fieldwork. This system’s public-facing web site stays up, however the equipment behind it’s gone. With nobody to approve new purposes, the method for researchers to entry the underlying microdata has floor to a halt.
How the DHS has saved lives
The shutdown isn’t nearly numbers on a spreadsheet. Right here’s how DHS knowledge has formed coverage and saved lives throughout the globe.
- Guinea: DHS knowledge was used to assist tailor the rollout of the brand new malaria vaccine.
- India: The 2019–2021 nationwide survey (India’s model of the DHS) confirmed a stark hole in menstrual hygiene between city and rural areas, which prompted a brand new nationwide coverage to deal with the disparity.
- Nepal: A 2016 DHS survey revealed stagnating maternal mortality charges. This spurred the federal government to reinforce its Protected Motherhood Program, leading to extra girls delivering infants in well being amenities quite than houses — and fewer girls dying in childbirth.
- Nigeria: DHS surveys confirmed little one marriage charges as excessive as 76 % in some states. Advocates used that as proof to efficiently push native governments to strengthen their legal guidelines in opposition to the observe.
There can even be long-term harm. When governments or assist organizations can not see precisely the place kids are malnourished, the place malaria outbreaks are quietly spreading, or the place moms are dying in childbirth, they’ll’t successfully goal life-saving interventions, leaving probably the most susceptible populations to pay the value. For twenty-four international locations, together with the Democratic Republic of Congo and Mali, the DHS was the only real knowledge supply for the UN’s official maternal mortality estimates. Going ahead, “it will simply be principally estimates which are primarily based on different international locations’ knowledge,” says Saloni Dattani, a editor on science and world well being at Works in Progress journal and 2022 Future Good 50 honoree. “We simply wouldn’t know.”
With out the info DHS offered, overseas assist turns into much less efficient, and fewer accountable “We’ve got no manner of externally or objectively estimating the optimistic affect that these [aid] applications are having, or destructive,” mentioned Livia Montana, the previous deputy director of the DHS Program, who’s now a survey director for the Understanding America Research on the College of Southern California.
Naturally, the worldwide well being neighborhood has been scrambling to plug the large hole. The Gates Basis not too long ago dedicated $25 million in emergency funding to rescue some ongoing surveys, and Bloomberg Philanthropies has additionally stepped in with a separate dedication to help the trouble.
This funding is a vital lifeline, however solely a stopgap. The seek for a long-term repair has pressured a reckoning with the outdated applications’ flaws. Everybody agrees that DHS delivered high-quality, trusted knowledge — but it surely wasn’t excellent. Many consultants have criticized it as essentially “donor-driven,” with priorities that didn’t all the time align with the nationwide pursuits of the international locations it surveyed. As an example, this system’s historic give attention to reproductive well being was a direct reflection of the priorities of its main funder, USAID, and a few nation officers privately felt the info served the accountability wants of worldwide organizations higher than their very own fast planning wants.
This has created a central dilemma for the worldwide growth neighborhood: is it doable to construct a brand new system that’s each genuinely country-led and in addition globally comparable?
A lifeline and a reckoning
Confronted with this knowledge vacuum, an apparent query arises: Why can’t different world organizations just like the World Well being Group or the United Nations merely step in and take over?
It’s not out of the query, however it will be actually, actually tough. Consider it this manner: The DHS Program was like a single, highly effective structure agency that perfected a blueprint and constructed homes in 90 neighborhoods for 40 years. As a result of it was a single program managed by non-public contractor, ICF Worldwide, and backed by one main funder, USAID, it might implement a standardized methodology all over the place it labored. As a for-profit agency, ICF’s curiosity was additionally monetary, it managed the worldwide contract and profited from the work.
The UN and WHO, against this, act as the worldwide metropolis planners: Their mandate isn’t to design and construct the homes themselves, however to set the constructing codes and security requirements for everybody. In line with WHO, its function is to not “immediately fund population-based surveys,” however to offer management and produce the precise stakeholders collectively.
Whereas that mandate could stop the UN from merely inheriting the outdated program’s work, it makes it a super coordinator for the trail ahead, says Caren Grown, a senior fellow on the Brookings Establishment’s Middle for Sustainable Growth. Grown argues that the UN is the one physique that may deal with the “heavy elevate” of coordinating all of the completely different international locations, donors, and organizations.
And now that the DHS has been dissolved, each Grown and Chen are actually a part of a UN activity power making an attempt to ascertain new internationally agreed-upon requirements for a way well being knowledge needs to be collected and ruled.
On the identical time, different efforts are extra targeted on the sensible work of implementation quite than on world governance. Montana is main a coalition to “rebuild components of DHS” by creating a worldwide consortium of analysis establishments that may present technical help to international locations. These efforts have been catalyzed by preliminary conversations hosted by organizations just like the Inhabitants Reference Bureau, which introduced collectively donors, authorities companies, and world knowledge customers to grapple with the shutdown’s fast aftermath.
Critics argue that for each India, there are a dozen different nations the place this system’s sudden collapse is proof {that a} deep, sustainable capability was by no means constructed.
Between this mishmash, probably the most sensible growth has been a lifeline from the Gates Basis, which introduced a $25 million funding in “bridge funding.” Individually, in a press release to Vox, Bloomberg Philanthropies confirmed its dedication to fund the completion of an extra 12-country surveys over the following eight months. A supply from the Gates Basis clarified that Bloomberg’s dedication is on high of theirs, confirming the 2 are distinct however coordinated rescue efforts.
The Gates Basis framed its effort as a short lived, stabilizing measure designed to offer the worldwide well being neighborhood a much-needed respite. “We consider knowledge is — and should stay — a worldwide public good,” mentioned Janet Zhou, a director targeted on knowledge and gender equality on the Gates Basis. “Our interim help helps to stabilize 14 ongoing nation surveys. … This funding is designed to offer world companions and nationwide governments the time and house wanted to construct a extra sustainable, country-led mannequin for well being knowledge.”
That help is aimed on the most pressing work: ending surveys that have been practically full, like in Ethiopia, and reopening the four-decade-old knowledge archive. However quite than giving every respective nation the cash to finish their ongoing surveys, the Gates funding will likely be administered by ICF Worldwide, the identical for-profit agency that ran the unique DHS.
The choice to work with the prevailing contractor, ICF Worldwide, was a realistic one. Persevering with with the identical implementer was the “quickest, most reasonably priced manner” to stop waste, and “a number of host international locations have shared a choice” to finish their work with the agency, mentioned a supply on the Gates Basis.
It’s a robust argument for triage in an emergency, but it surely additionally papers over deeper flaws. Check out Nigeria, for instance: Fieldwork for its 2023–’24 DHS completed in Could 2024, and the questionnaires gathered new estimates of maternal and little one deaths. Nigeria additionally ran a separate examine to probe precisely why moms and kids are dying. In precept, the 2 datasets ought to dovetail however past a headline-numbers report, the total DHS micro-dataset remains to be in ICF’s processing queue — possible frozen after DHS’s shuttering.
That bottleneck illustrates what critics imply by “donor-driven.” With barely 3 % of family surveys in low-income international locations fully-financed by the native authorities, the WHO notes, most nations should depend on “externally led surveys…limiting continuity and nationwide possession.” When the donor funding stops, so does the info pipeline.
An ICF spokesperson pushed again saying survey priorities have been “primarily formed by the collaborating international locations.” But, of the $25 million that arrived from Gates, a big portion of it’ll go towards finishing large-scale surveys in Nigeria and Kenya, two international locations that additionally occur to be key “geographies of curiosity” for the Gates Basis’s personal strategic priorities, underscoring how funders nonetheless steer the highlight.
Insiders I spoke with described ICF’s system as a “black field,” with key elements of its methodology managed by the contractor, leaving international locations with out the capability to face on their very own. That issues as a result of with out home-grown statisticians and know-how, ministries can’t rerun surveys or replace indicators with out outdoors assist. In response, ICF said that this system has a “confirmed monitor document of constructing a long-term capability,” noting that international locations like India not require its help.
However critics argue that for each India, there are a dozen different nations the place this system’s sudden collapse is proof {that a} deep, sustainable capability was by no means constructed. This dependency creates a fragile system that may, as simply occurred, collapse in a single day, leaving international locations unable to proceed that work on their very own.
This unresolved rigidity brings the talk again to a central query from the UN’s Chen. “DHS has been there for 4 a long time,” she asks, “and why are we nonetheless having this program doing the survey for international locations?”
Chen’s query will get to the center of the talk. However grappling with the failings of the previous can’t get in the best way of surviving the current. Current world well being knowledge is already a number of years old-fashioned because of the pandemic, whereas crises in maternal mortality and little one vitamin proceed to unfold. The necessity is for dependable knowledge now, as a result of the basic actuality stays: You possibly can’t assist individuals you possibly can’t see.
