James decries Trump’s ‘weaponisation’ of the justice system after second failed try to federally prosecute her.
Revealed On 5 Dec 2025
A federal grand jury has rejected prosecutors’ try to revive a legal case towards New York Legal professional Common Letitia James, after a decide beforehand threw out expenses levelled towards the distinguished critic of United States President Donald Trump.
The indictment on Thursday marks the Division of Justice’s second failed try to prosecute James, an elected Democrat towards whom Trump had vowed retribution after her workplace introduced a civil fraud case towards him and his household enterprise.
Advisable Tales
listing of three objectsfinish of listing
In November, US District Decide Cameron McGowan Currie dismissed a mortgage fraud case towards James after discovering that the federal prosecutor who secured the indictment, Lindsey Halligan, was unlawfully appointed.
James has maintained that the makes an attempt to prosecute her are blatantly political. On Thursday, she once more mentioned allegations towards her have been “baseless” as she known as for the “unchecked weaponisation of our justice system to cease”.
Her lawyer, Abbe Lowell, mentioned any effort to proceed the case would represent “a surprising assault on the rule of regulation and a devastating blow to the integrity of our justice system”.
“The grand jury’s refusal to re-indict Legal professional Common James is a decisive rejection of a case that ought to by no means have existed within the first place,” Lowell mentioned in a press release.
Regardless of the grand jury’s determination, federal prosecutors are nonetheless reportedly planning to hunt a brand new indictment towards James, the Reuters information company reported, citing two unnamed sources accustomed to the matter.
Vows of retribution
After James’s workplace introduced the civil case towards Trump, a Decide in 2024 ordered him to pay a $450m penalty after discovering he fraudulently overstated his web value to mislead lenders.
A New York state appeals court docket in August threw out the penalty however upheld the decide’s discovering that Trump was chargeable for fraud.
Trump has repeatedly mentioned the case was a part of a political “witch-hunt” towards him that additionally included 4 since-dropped legal instances following his first time period.
James is certainly one of three high-profile critics of Trump hit with federal legal expenses in current months, alongside former FBI director James Comey and former Trump nationwide safety adviser John Bolton.
A case towards Comey, who led investigations into alleged collusion between Trump’s 2016 marketing campaign and Russia, was additionally dismissed in late November by Decide Currie, citing the identical illegal appointment of Halligan.
Bolton has pleaded not responsible to federal expenses accusing him of sharing delicate authorities info with two kin and retaining “paperwork, writings, and notes” containing categorized materials.
