The Harry S. Truman Federal Constructing, headquarters of the U.S. Division of State, in a 2024 file photograph.
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Pictures
disguise caption
toggle caption
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Pictures
The State Division is instructing its workers to reject visa functions from individuals who labored on fact-checking, content material moderation or different actions the Trump administration considers “censorship” of Individuals’ speech.
The directive, despatched in an inner memo on Tuesday, is targeted on candidates for H-1B visas for extremely expert employees, that are regularly utilized by tech corporations, amongst different sectors. The memo was first reported by Reuters; NPR additionally obtained a replica.
“Should you uncover proof an applicant was accountable for, or complicit in, censorship or tried censorship of protected expression in america, you must pursue a discovering that the applicant is ineligible” for a visa, the memo says. It refers to a coverage introduced by Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Could proscribing visas from being issued to “international officers and individuals who’re complicit in censoring Individuals.”
The Trump administration has been extremely crucial of tech corporations’ efforts to police what individuals are allowed to put up on their platforms and of the broader area of belief and security, the tech trade’s time period for groups that target stopping abuse, fraud, unlawful content material, and different dangerous conduct on-line.
President Trump was banned from a number of social media platforms within the aftermath of his supporters’ assault on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Whereas these bans have since been lifted, the president and members of his administration regularly cite that have as proof for his or her claims that tech corporations unfairly goal conservatives — whilst many tech leaders have eased their insurance policies within the face of that backlash.
Tuesday’s memo calls out H-1B visa candidates particularly “as many work in or have labored within the tech sector, together with in social media or monetary providers corporations concerned within the suppression of protected expression.”
It directs consular officers to “totally discover” the work histories of candidates, each new and returning, by reviewing their resumes, LinkedIn profiles, and appearances in media articles for actions together with combatting misinformation, disinformation or false narratives, fact-checking, content material moderation, compliance, and belief and security.
“I am alarmed that belief and security work is being conflated with ‘censorship’,” mentioned Alice Goguen Hunsberger, who has labored in belief and security at tech corporations together with OpenAI and Grindr.
“Belief and security is a broad observe which incorporates crucial and life-saving work to guard youngsters and cease CSAM [child sexual abuse material], in addition to stopping fraud, scams, and sextortion. T&S employees are targeted on making the web a safer and higher place, not censoring only for the sake of it,” she mentioned. “Unhealthy actors that concentrate on Individuals come from all around the world and it is so vital to have individuals who perceive totally different languages and cultures on belief and security groups — having international employees at tech corporations in [trust and safety] completely retains Individuals safer.”
In a press release, a State Division spokesperson who declined to provide their identify mentioned the division doesn’t touch upon “allegedly leaked paperwork,” however added: “the Administration has made clear that it defends Individuals’ freedom of expression in opposition to foreigners who want to censor them. We don’t help aliens coming to america to work as censors muzzling Individuals.”
The assertion continued: “Prior to now, the President himself was the sufferer of this type of abuse when social media corporations locked his accounts. He doesn’t need different Individuals to endure this manner. Permitting foreigners to steer such a censorship would each insult and injure the American folks.”
First Modification specialists criticized the memo’s steering as itself a possible violation of free speech rights.
“Individuals who research misinformation and work on content-moderation groups aren’t engaged in ‘censorship’— they’re engaged in actions that the First Modification was designed to guard. This coverage is incoherent and unconstitutional,” mentioned Carrie DeCell, senior workers lawyer and legislative advisor on the Knight First Modification Institute at Columbia College, in a press release.
Even because the administration has focused these it claims are engaged in censoring Individuals, it has additionally tightened its personal scrutiny of visa candidates’ on-line speech.
On Wednesday, the State Division introduced it could require H-1B visa candidates and their dependents to set their social media profiles to “public” to allow them to be reviewed by U.S. officers.
NPR’s Bobby Allyn and Michele Kelemen contributed reporting.
