Subscribe right here: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube | Overcast | Pocket Casts
The navy parade Donald Trump has orchestrated to mark the 250th anniversary of the Military—which occurs to be his birthday—will not be the primary time that tanks have rolled down Structure Avenue. That occurred most just lately in June 1991 to have fun the tip of the Gulf Conflict. The speech Trump delivered at Fort Bragg this week will not be the primary time a president has used active-duty troopers as a backdrop. That occurs on a regular basis. However context is every thing, and this president is placing out all of the alerts that he desires to make use of the navy in an entire new manner, or a minimum of new for a thriving democracy.
On this episode of Radio Atlantic, we discuss to employees author Tom Nichols about how all of the items match collectively: the navy parade, the speech at Fort Bragg, and the dispatching of Marines to the protests in Los Angeles.
It’s not simply that Trump desires to acclimate Individuals to the sight of tanks within the streets. It’s not simply that Trump is signaling to governors that he’ll use the forces at his disposal to override their needs. The true drawback is how the navy might start to see itself.
The next is a transcript of the episode:
Hanna Rosin: The day after the Trump administration mobilized 700 Marines to reply to immigration protests in Los Angeles and 4 days earlier than his navy parade within the nation’s capital, President Trump walked out on a stage to Lee Greenwood’s “God Bless the usA.”
[“God Bless the U.S.A.” plays]
Rosin: —and boasted in regards to the crowd measurement.
President Trump: It is a report crowd. You understand you by no means—you by no means had a crowd this huge. That’s an honor. You suppose this crowd would have confirmed up for Biden? I don’t suppose so. I don’t suppose so. And perhaps I’m unsuitable. Perhaps I’m unsuitable.
Rosin: That is stuff straight out of the Trump playbook. Brag in regards to the crowd measurement? Examine. Point out Biden? Examine. Name the media “faux information” and whip up the boos towards them?
Trump: Have a look at all of them. Aye yai yai, what I’ve to place up with. Faux information. (Crowd boos.)
Rosin: Examine and verify.
Trump: What I’ve to place up with.
[Music]
Rosin: There have been chants of “U.S.A.!” Folks purchased campaign-style merchandise: Make America Nice Once more hats and chains, and pretend bank cards that stated White Privilege Card: Trumps Every part.
However the distinction this time was that this all occurred at a navy base: Fort Bragg, in North Carolina. And the gang was stuffed with active-duty troopers.
Trump: I used to be elected, profitable all seven swing states, the favored vote by thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of votes, and all counties all through America by 2,750 to 525. That’s what I name a giant quantity.
Rosin: That is Radio Atlantic. I’m Hanna Rosin.
Presidents have used the navy as backdrops earlier than. It’s a fragile artwork. There have additionally been navy parades prior to now. However with the timing of all of it—deploying Marines and the Nationwide Guard, a rustic very a lot divided—issues really feel completely different. And if it’s certainly a fragile artwork, Trump will not be being refined.
So on the eve of the large parade in Washington—“higher and greater than any parade we’ve ever had on this nation,” as Trump put it—we referred to as up employees author Tom Nichols, who writes in regards to the navy for The Atlantic and has taught for 25 years on the U.S. Naval Conflict School, to assist us suppose this by way of.
[Music]
Rosin: So this navy parade is occurring this weekend. It’s meant to have fun the Military’s 250th birthday. It additionally occurs to be Trump’s 79th birthday, and Trump has stated it’s going to be higher and greater than any parade we’ve ever had on this nation.
So, Tom, on the one hand, it’s only a fancy parade with fireworks and all that. However, what message are you, who’s good at studying military-coded symbols, seeing on this parade?
Tom Nichols: Properly, initially, the navy wasn’t going to do that parade. So the concept this simply occurs to be a navy parade that simply coincidentally occurred on Trump’s birthday is nonsense.
Trump has wished this type of parade. And that is what he thinks the navy does, is throw parades for the commander in chief. And he’s doing it whereas he’s sending troops into the streets of an American metropolis, and I’m certain he’s very happy for that break up display to say, you understand, These are my guys. That is my Military, my generals, my artillery. And in the event you screw with me, that is what it seems like in Los Angeles.
Rosin: So that you learn it as my parade. Like, you learn the break up display as essential to understanding this navy parade, not simply as some form of empty symbolism: He likes the look of it. He likes match troops. Like, it’s simply aesthetically pleasing to him. That’s not all it’s, in your thoughts?
Nichols: No. He clearly loves these items. I imply, Trump is, in some ways, very childlike. He likes shiny issues and uniforms and massive parades, and he’s wished this for some time, however I believe he and the opposite individuals round him are additionally very happy to create a second form of symbolism right here, of: I’m the president. I’m the commander in chief. I can put tanks within the streets anytime I really feel prefer it.
As a result of bear in mind: He wished to do that. He was aching to do this type of stuff in the course of the 2020 protests, and, you understand, individuals within the Pentagon, together with his personal secretary of protection and the chairman of the Joint Chief[s of Staff] stated, It is a unhealthy thought. And he has discovered his lesson. He surrounds himself now with people who find themselves by no means going to inform him that something is a nasty thought.
Rosin: Within the lead as much as the parade, he gave this speech at Fort Bragg. Now, he’s not the primary president to offer a speech in entrance of a navy crowd. Presidents use the navy as a backdrop on a regular basis. What was completely different about this speech?
Nichols: It wasn’t a speech. It was a political rally. He didn’t use the backdrop of a navy base to say, I’m right here to speak in regards to the future navy improvement, the protection division, you understand, worldwide relations. He simply stood up there in a very partisan mode, sporting his little purple hat, and he inspired U.S. Military troopers to affix him in a giant, partisan hootenanny.
And this truly goes again to your query, Hanna, about what he’s eager about this parade. He very a lot desires these troopers to [hear], Bear in mind, I’m your solely defender. I’m the robust man who loves you. America hates you. And that’s toxic. It’s a repudiation of every thing that folks from George Washington to George Marshall to Brent Scowcroft to others have at all times stood for in serving this nation, both in civilian roles or as navy leaders.
That’s how different international locations fall into civil warfare and chaos and mayhem, is that the navy turns into—while you politicize the navy, the navy turns into an impartial actor. And it says, There’s Republicans. There’s Democrats. There’s rural. There’s metropolis. And there’s us. And we’re an curiosity group. And we’re an impartial group with an impartial say in who runs this nation. And also you don’t need the navy saying, Oh, the election subsequent yr? That’ll be fascinating, however we get a veto.
Rosin: Proper. So it’s not nearly Trump having a military or navy that he can manipulate. It’s in regards to the navy beginning to see itself as an impartial actor.
Nichols: Completely.
Rosin: I’m making an attempt to think about—truly, I don’t need to get distracted, however I’m making an attempt to think about—what it could be like for the residents of Washington to look at tanks roll down their avenue. It’s form of a profound picture.
Nichols: Properly, particularly at a time like this, I imply, context is every thing. And when Donald Trump has been strolling round like a wannabe dictator, speaking in regards to the navy as his private muscle, the symbolism of rumbling a tank down Structure Avenue is, you understand—I imply, look: These individuals know precisely what they’re doing. They know the pictures they’re creating.
And a part of the purpose right here is—and I believe that that is true in Los Angeles, and I believe it’s true with the Washington parade—Trump and his individuals need to acclimate Individuals to the sight of the U.S. navy of their streets, which is without doubt one of the most un-American issues, going all the way in which again to the Founders, who had a deep suspicion of a standing military.
We honor the individuals who serve in our navy. We worth them. We cherish them. However no, we don’t need them driving Humvees, you understand, by way of the streets of D.C. every single day.
Rosin: Yeah, it’s a very good level. I’ve clearly seen Nationwide Guard within the streets earlier than, however seeing tanks in D.C. streets whereas, on the opposite coast, Marines are being deployed in Los Angeles has a really completely different feeling.
Nichols: I believe it feels unsuitable, and partially as a result of, you understand, a part of the safety of American freedom is embedded in our system of federalism in order that your native police are answerable to your native authorities, which in flip may be outdated by your state police, who solutions to your state authorities. And if issues actually get robust, you’ve got a Nationwide Guard of your fellow residents, your neighbors, your mates who’re then answerable, as effectively, to the governor.
It is best to need to undergo an entire bunch of blown circuits earlier than you get to america navy being within the streets of our personal nation, partially not simply because it’s such a violation of every thing from, you understand, George Washington onward. I imply, this complete factor with the parade is one thing I believe that will make the daddy of the American Military, George Washington, ailing. But it surely’s additionally one thing that we keep away from as a result of it truly is—you understand, for conservatives who discuss not desirous to have a dictatorial central authorities, they’re appearing like they actually need a dictatorial central authorities.
And while you discuss in regards to the Military. You understand, you’re saying, State, native, county, authorities—none of that issues. The one actual energy on this nation is correct right here within the White Home on this one man. And it’s additionally a nasty thought as a result of the navy itself hates these missions. And that’s good—you need a navy that doesn’t like domestic-policing missions.
Rosin: Proper. Properly, talking of bypassing native authority, that is all taking place towards the backdrop of Trump sending the Nationwide Guard and troops to Los Angeles to take care of the protests towards ICE raids, which Trump has referred to as “lawless” and “an invasion.” And Governor Gavin Newsom says he didn’t ask for assist and stated the L.A. police might deal with them. Why do you suppose he despatched the troops then?
Nichols: Particularly to point out that Gavin Newsom will not be accountable for the state of California, and that Karen Bass will not be accountable for the town of Los Angeles. It’s a really dramatic manner of claiming, All energy on this nation belongs to me, Donald Trump, and if I see one thing in Los Angeles I don’t like, I don’t care who the individuals of California elected—they imply nothing—I’m going to name out the Military as a result of I can, and I need to set up that I can.
[Music]
Rosin: After the break, how one can engineer a disaster—and how one can counter it.
[Break]
Rosin: He does use the phrase “liberate Los Angeles,” however I’m nonetheless not clear what it serves him. Why there? And also you stated he noticed issues that he didn’t like. A minimum of as Gavin Newsom places it and stories from Los Angeles, they weren’t particularly violent. They didn’t get uncontrolled. It wasn’t a scenario that the L.A. police couldn’t deal with, a minimum of in accordance with Gavin Newsom. So what’s it that he’s making an attempt to do or accomplish? What’s the symbolism? What does it imply?
Nichols: Oh, you understand, Trump has a genius for choosing the right fights. Bear in mind: His purpose has nothing actually to do with Los Angeles or California. The technique right here is: Let’s go to a blue state. Let’s go to one of many bluest cities within the blue states. Let’s completely humiliate those who the American proper actually hates. And let’s do it in a spot the place our narrative that America is below international invasion, which permits me to invoke these outdated legal guidelines, Alien Acts, and so forth in response to an invasion—let’s go do it within the one place the place I can depend on the native inhabitants to do their half by cosplaying as precisely the form of, you understand, foreign-invasion drive that I want them to play.
They are going to play their function. And if there was anywhere they’re going to do it, it’s going to be in Los Angeles.
Rosin: Proper. So perhaps it’s an instance of what individuals at all times say about Trump, that he can engineer his personal actuality. I imply, he can stage the theater after which stroll into it.
Nichols: After I taught technique—there’s an expression we use once we’re speaking about while you’re making an attempt to plan your operations and your opponent isn’t notably adept. We name {that a} “cooperative adversary.” And Trump went someplace the place he is aware of he has a cooperative adversary.
Rosin: Proper. So in his speech on Tuesday, Newsom stated, “It’s time for all of us to face up.” He left it imprecise what he meant by that, however that’s what he stated. You wrote a few what I believed have been chilling sentences directed on the protesters, telling them to not provoke the troopers. What you wrote was, “You’ll not be heroes. You can be pretext.” What do you imply by that? Pretext for what?
Nichols: A much bigger crackdown, and for legislative motion by these Republicans to say, Yeah, go forward. We gained’t cease you if you wish to invoke the Riot Act. The American individuals on each the precise and the left, sadly, particularly on the fringes, have—I believe what George Will correctly as soon as referred to as—a “starvation for apocalypse,” a form of aching for drama, the place they need to really feel like they’re a part of a giant tableau of a giant journey film with a Hans Zimmer rating.
And Trump is aware of that. He has an ideal intuition for theater. He has an ideal intuition for what is going to set off his opponents, and going to Los Angeles with the Military was only a very intelligent factor to do. And one of many issues that you simply see that generally humiliates authoritarians is after they say, There are horrible issues taking place, and folks say, I used to be at work as we speak. Every part appears positive to me.
Rosin: Yeah. Our author Anne Applebaum wrote about this, that when there’s a form of a lull within the motion or perhaps a downturn in help, there’s a must engineer a disaster. And she or he’s suggesting perhaps this, what’s taking place in L.A. now, is the engineering of a disaster, to form of whip that theater again up once more.
Nichols: It’s completely what he’s doing. And he’s pondering forward. One other of our colleagues, David Frum, made the purpose that it is a costume rehearsal. He’s going to search for alternatives, maybe even throughout voting, the place he’s going to say, Oh, I see irregularities. I see issues. I see individuals saying they’re being harassed on the polls, and by then, he could have gotten us used to, you understand, in this type of “boiling the frog” strategy. He could have us used to the president simply working roughshod over the governors and sending within the Military.
Rosin: So if Individuals have an urge for food for this type of drama, what do you suppose can be an efficient solution to counter this, what you name, authoritarian tendency?
Nichols: Properly, that’s the factor. Folks on social media get mad at me and I say, Properly, have you ever thought of voting? As a result of individuals say, Properly, I voted. Sure, however have you ever voted on the native and state stage? There are issues you are able to do. You possibly can register individuals to vote; you may donate to organizations which can be preventing this in court docket.
And I believe the courts—and I’ve written about this, the courts—have turn out to be the final line of protection, and I believe they’re truly doing effectively. And I believe one of many causes Trump is doing all it is because he’s been shedding so constantly. He’s making an attempt to determine a solution to short-circuit the boring drudgery of the authorized course of that retains working towards him.
So, you understand, my reply is, look—the Founders have been nice believers in stoicism. I imagine there are occasions to enter the streets, but when the president is laying a big entice, don’t stroll into it.
Rosin: Tom, thanks a lot for becoming a member of me.
[Music]
Nichols: Thanks for having me, Hanna.
Rosin: This bonus episode of Radio Atlantic was produced by Jinae West and Rosie Hughes. It was edited by Claudine Ebeid and engineered by Rob Smierciak. Claudine Ebeid is the chief producer of Atlantic audio, and Andrea Valdez is our managing editor.
Listeners, in the event you like what you hear on Radio Atlantic, you may help our work and the work of all Atlantic journalists while you subscribe to The Atlantic at theatlantic.com/listener.
I’m Hanna Rosin. Thanks for listening.
