HomeSample Page

Sample Page Title


This text is a part of a sponsored collection by Knowledgeable Insured.

In 2025, MGAs and carriers aren’t debating whether or not to automate – they’re debating the place. Ought to submissions be routed by means of e mail and OCR triage? Or pushed by means of a full-blown API quoting expertise?

This weblog breaks down when to make use of email-based consumption (backed by AI + human ops), when to lean on API quoting, and easy methods to mix each relying in your provider connectivity, information hygiene, and scale.

The Case for API Quoting

Finest For: Carriers with clear API entry, program managers with recognized guidelines, low-friction LOBs

Professionals:

  • Immediate charge response, typically <2s
  • No human overview if information is clear
  • Can combine with CRMs or front-end portals
  • Trackable – quote logs, success/fail information

Cons:

  • Solely works with taking part carriers
  • Can fail silently if information is malformed
  • Requires structured consumption (kinds, required fields)

The Case for E-mail-Primarily based Consumption + AI OCR

Finest For: Dealer submissions, multi-LOB packages, carriers with out APIs

Professionals:

  • Accepts real-world consumption – binders, insurance coverage app kinds, spreadsheets
  • GPT + OCR classify and extract for quoting
  • Extra versatile for mid-market packages
  • Simpler to onboard: works on day one with inbox + entry

Cons:

  • Requires QA fallbacks
  • Barely slower: 2-4 hour quoting SLA vs real-time API
  • Information inconsistency can enhance triage effort

Selectsys Blends Each: Hybrid Quoting Layer

SituationWhat Selectsys Makes use of
Retail dealer sends e mailGPT classifier → RQB prep → BPO QA
API-ready submission through portalDirect RQB API name → return quote
PDF + consumption kind submissionOCR → discipline extraction → quote set off
Lacking provider urge for food informationPath to underwriter for determination

Check Case

Consumer: Mid-sized MGA with 12 packages, 4 API-enabled, 8 email-only

Earlier than:

  • Quoting was 100% guide
  • 3 underwriters dealt with consumption → quote prep → bind requests

After Selectsys:

  • API submissions routed immediately by means of RQB
  • Non-API emails categorized by GPT, triaged by Selectsys ops
  • Quote quantity doubled with no enhance in underwriter workload
  • Bind turnaround dropped from 2 days → below 8 hours

FAQs

Can I take advantage of RQB with each API and guide submissions?
Sure. RQB helps hybrid workflows – utilizing APIs when obtainable and fallback workflows (e mail, doc consumption) when not.

What occurs if the API fails or provider doesn’t reply?
The quote is flagged, and a Selectsys underwriter or BPO workforce member follows up through guide quoting.

How do you deal with completely different LOBs in the identical submission?
RQB chains quotes by line – triggering API if supported, fallback to guide in any other case.

Do we have to format emails or attachments a sure means?
No. Our GPT classifier reads unstructured emails and attachments.

Can producers submit through portal as an alternative of e mail?
Sure. We are able to embed RQB into portals or CRMs to set off quotes mechanically.

Automate The place You Can. Route Intelligently The place You Can’t.
Let Selectsys deal with quoting with the right combination of API pace and human oversight.

Begin a Pilot

Was this text worthwhile?


Listed below are extra articles you could get pleasure from.

Occupied with Automation Optimization?

Get automated alerts for this matter.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles