Clorox is suing IT big Cognizant for gross negligence, alleging it enabled an enormous August 2023 cyberattack by resetting an worker’s password for a hacker with out first verifying their id.
The incident was first made public in September 2023, reportedly carried out by hackers related to Scattered Spider, who utilized a social engineering assault to breach the corporate.
The lawsuit says Cognizant offered IT providers to Clorox, together with service desk help and id administration, which was the purpose of compromise that led to a devastating and dear cyberattack for the corporate.
Clorox is a significant shopper items firm, greatest identified for family cleansing merchandise, bleach, disinfectants, and private care objects. Cognizant is a worldwide IT providers and consulting firm, offering cloud providers, software program growth, and cybersecurity.
Based on the criticism, from 2013 to 2023, Cognizant was contracted by Clorox to deal with its IT operations.
“Cognizant offered the service desk (“Service Desk”) that Clorox workers might contact after they wanted password restoration or reset help,” reads the criticism shared with BleepingComputer.
“Cognizant’s operation of the Service Desk got here with a easy, commonsense requirement: by no means reset anybody’s credentials with out correctly authenticating them first. Clorox made this straightforward for Cognizant by offering them with straight-forward procedures to observe each time offering credential restoration or reset help.”
Nevertheless, the criticism alleges that on August 11, 2023, recordings present {that a} cybercriminal known as Cognizant’s Service Desk a number of occasions, pretending to be a Clorox consultant requesting password and multi-factor authentication resets.
“At no level throughout any of the calls did the Agent confirm that the caller was in truth Worker 1. At no level did the Agent observe Clorox’s credential help procedures—both the pre-2023 process or the January 2023 replace—earlier than altering the password for the cybercriminal. The Agent additional reset Worker 1’s MFA credentials a number of occasions with none id verification in any respect. And at no level did the Agent ship the required emails to the worker or the worker’s supervisor to alert them of the password reset. “Clorox claims within the criticism.
This kind of social engineering assault has turn out to be the hallmark of Scattered Spider assaults, lately utilized in UK retail assaults on Marks & Spencer and Co-op.
After allegedly failing to confirm the caller’s precise id, Cognizant reset the credentials and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for the hacker, granting them entry to Clorox’s IT community.
To make issues worse, Clorox alleges that the menace actors used the identical playbook to reset the password and MFA for one more worker who labored in IT safety, which was finished with out verification as soon as once more. This reportedly gave the attackers privileged entry to the community, which they used to unfold to additional units.

Supply: Clorox criticism in opposition to Cognizant
Clorox states that Cognizant’s actions paralyzed its company community, halted manufacturing, and prompted widespread product shortages and enterprise interruption.
Along with this, Clorox described Cognizant’s response and restoration help as overly incompetent, leading to delays within the software of containment measures, failure to close down compromised accounts, and sending underqualified personnel on premises.
“The ensuing Cyberattack was debilitating. It paralyzed Clorox’s company community and crippled enterprise operations,” describes the authorized criticism.
“And to make issues worse, when Clorox known as on Cognizant to offer incident response and catastrophe restoration help providers, Cognizant botched its response and compounded the harm it had already prompted.”
Clorox’s criticism alleges breach of contract because of Cognizant’s failure to fulfill ITSA obligations, breach of fine religion and truthful dealing, gross negligence, and intentional misrepresentation of employees coaching on the consumer’s credential reset procedures.
For these actions, which resulted in a whole bunch of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in misplaced gross sales because of enterprise disruption, in addition to reputational harm with long-term penalties, Clorox is in search of $49 million in direct remediation damages and $380,000,000 in complete damages.
BleepingComputer tried to contact Cognizant for a touch upon the lawsuit, however the listed press deal with was returned with a supply failure.