A Minnesota cybersecurity and laptop forensics professional whose testimony has featured in 1000’s of courtroom trials over the previous 30 years is going through questions on his credentials and an inquiry from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Authorized consultants say the inquiry may very well be grounds to reopen numerous adjudicated instances through which the professional’s testimony might have been pivotal.
One would possibly conclude from studying Mr. Lanterman’s LinkedIn profile that has a level from Harvard College.
Mark Lanterman is a former investigator for the U.S. Secret Service Electronics Crimes Job Drive who based the Minneapolis consulting agency Laptop Forensic Providers (CFS). The CFS web site says Lanterman’s 30-year profession has seen him testify as an professional in additional than 2,000 instances, with expertise in instances involving sexual harassment and office claims, theft of mental property and commerce secrets and techniques, white-collar crime, and sophistication motion lawsuits.
Or no less than it did till final month, when Lanterman’s profile and work historical past had been quietly faraway from the CFS web site. The elimination got here after Hennepin County Lawyer’s Workplace mentioned it was notifying events to 10 pending instances that they had been unable to confirm Lanterman’s academic and employment background. The county lawyer additionally mentioned the FBI is now investigating the allegations.
These allegations had been raised by Sean Harrington, an lawyer and forensics examiner primarily based in Prescott, Wisconsin. Harrington alleged that Lanterman lied underneath oath in courtroom on a number of events when he testified that he has a Bachelor of Science and a Grasp’s diploma in laptop science from the now-defunct Upsala Faculty, and that he accomplished his postgraduate work in cybersecurity at Harvard College.
Harrington’s claims gained steam due to digging by the regulation agency Perkins Coie LLP, which is defending a case whereby a consumer’s laptop computer was forensically reviewed by Lanterman. On March 14, Perkins Coie attorneys requested the decide (PDF) to strike Lanterman’s testimony as a result of neither he nor they might substantiate claims about his academic background.
Upsala Faculty, positioned in East Orange, N.J., operated for 102 years till it closed in 1995 after a interval of declining enrollment and monetary difficulties. Perkins Coie instructed the courtroom that they’d visited Felician College, which holds the transcripts for Upsala Faculty in the course of the years Lanterman claimed to have earned undergraduate and graduate levels. The regulation agency mentioned Felician had no document of transcripts for Lanterman (PDF), and that his identify was absent from all the Upsala Faculty scholar yearbooks and graduation packages throughout that interval.
Reached for remark, Lanterman acknowledged he had no strategy to show he attended Upsala Faculty, and that his “postgraduate work” at Harvard was the truth is an eight-week on-line cybersecurity class referred to as HarvardX, which cautions that its certificates shouldn’t be thought-about equal to a Harvard diploma or a certificates earned via conventional, in-person packages at Harvard College.
Lanterman has testified that his first job after faculty was serving as a police officer in Springfield Township, Pennsylvania, though the Perkins Coie attorneys famous that this function was omitted from his resume. The attorneys mentioned once they tried to confirm Lanterman’s work historical past, “the police division responded with a narrative that may be virtually not possible to imagine if it was not corroborated by Lanterman’s personal electronic mail communications.”
As recounted within the March 14 submitting, Lanterman was deposed on Feb. 11, and the next day he emailed the Springfield Township Police Division to see if he might have a peek at his outdated personnel file. On Feb. 14, Lanterman visited the Springfield Township PD and requested to borrow his employment document. He instructed the officer he spoke with on the telephone that he’d just lately been instructed to “get his affairs so as” after being recognized with a grave coronary heart situation, and that he needed his outdated file to point out his household about his early profession.
In keeping with Perkins Coie, Lanterman left the Springfield Township PD together with his personnel file, and has not returned it as promised.
“It’s stunning that an professional from Minnesota would journey to suburban Philadelphia and abscond together with his decades-old personnel file to obscure his background,” the regulation agency wrote. “That seems to be the worst and most egregious type of spoliation, and the deception alone is motive sufficient to exclude Lanterman and contemplate sanctions.”
Harrington initially contacted KrebsOnSecurity about his issues in late 2023, fuming after sitting via a convention speech through which Lanterman shared paperwork from a ransomware sufferer and instructed attendees it was as a result of they’d refused to rent his firm to carry out a forensic investigation on a latest breach.
“He claims he was concerned within the Martha Stewart investigation, the Bernie Madoff trial, Paul McCartney’s divorce, the Tom Petters investigation, the Denny Hecker investigation, and plenty of others,” Harrington mentioned. “He claims to have been invited to talk to the Supreme Court docket, claims to coach the ‘whole federal judiciary’ on cybersecurity yearly, and is a college member of the USA Judicial Convention and the Judicial Faculty — positions which he obtained, partially, on a home of fraudulent playing cards.”
In an interview this week, Harrington mentioned courtroom paperwork reveal that no less than two of Lanterman’s earlier purchasers complained CFS had held their information for ransom over billing disputes. In a declaration (PDF) dated August 2022, the co-founder of the regulation agency MoreLaw Minneapolis LLC mentioned she employed Lanterman in 2014 to look at a number of digital gadgets after studying that considered one of their paralegals had a felony fraud historical past.
However the regulation agency mentioned when it pushed again on a consulting invoice that was far larger than anticipated, Lanterman instructed them CFS would “escalate” its assortment efforts in the event that they didn’t pay, together with “a declare and lien towards the information which can end in a public public sale of your information.”
“All of us had been flabbergasted by Mr. Lanterman’s electronic mail,” wrote MoreLaw co-founder Kimberly Hanlon. “I had by no means heard of any professional forensic firm threatening to ‘public sale’ off an lawyer’s information, significantly realizing that the information is comprised of confidential consumer information, a lot of which is delicate in nature.”
In 2009, a Wisconsin-based manufacturing firm that had employed Lanterman for laptop forensics balked at paying an $86,000 bill from CFS, calling it “extreme and unsubstantiated.” The corporate instructed a Hennepin County courtroom that on April 15, 2009, CFS performed an public sale of its commerce secret data in violation of their confidentiality settlement.
“CFS observed and performed a Public Sale of digital data that was entrusted to them pursuant to the phrases of the engagement settlement,” the corporate wrote. “CFS submitted the very best bid on the Public Sale within the quantity of $10,000.”
Lanterman briefly responded to a listing of questions on his background (and up to date coronary heart analysis) on March 24, saying he would ship detailed replies the next day. These replies by no means materialized. As a substitute, Lanterman forwarded a latest memo he wrote to the courtroom that attacked Harrington and mentioned his accuser was solely attempting to take out a competitor. He has not responded to additional requests for remark.
“After I attended Upsala, I used to be a commuter scholar who lived with my grandparents in Morristown, New Jersey roughly half-hour away from Upsala Faculty,” Lanterman defined to the decide (PDF) overseeing a separate ongoing case (PDF) through which he has testified. “With restricted assets, I didn’t take part in campus social occasions, nor did I attend commencement ceremonies. In 2023, I confirmed with Felician College — which maintains Upsala Faculty’s information — that they might not find my transcripts or diploma, a state of affairs that they indicated was presumably resulting from unresolved money-related points.”
Lanterman was ordered to seem in courtroom on April 3 within the case defended by Perkins Coie, however he didn’t present up. As a substitute, he despatched a message to the decide withdrawing from the case.
“I’m 60 years outdated,” Lanterman instructed the decide. “I created my enterprise from nothing. I’m executed coping with the likes of people like Sean Harrington. And fairly frankly, I’ve been planning at turning over my enterprise to my youngsters for years. That point has arrived.”
Lanterman’s letter leaves the impression that it was his resolution to retire. However in line with an affidavit (PDF) filed in a Florida case on March 28, Mark Lanterman’s son Sean mentioned he’d made the tough resolution to ask his dad to step down given all of the unfavorable media consideration.
Mark Rasch, a former federal cybercrime prosecutor who now serves as counsel to the New York cybersecurity intelligence agency Unit 221B, mentioned that if an professional witness is discredited, any defendants who misplaced instances that had been strongly influenced by that professional’s conclusions at trial might have grounds for attraction.
Rasch mentioned regulation companies who suggest an professional witness have an obligation in good religion to vet that professional’s {qualifications}, realizing that these credentials shall be topic to cross-examination.
“Federal guidelines of civil process and proof each require consultants to record each case they’ve testified in as an professional for the previous few years,” Rasch mentioned. “A part of that due diligence is pulling up the outcomes of these instances and seeing what the character of their testimony has been.”
Maybe essentially the most well-publicized case involving vital forensic findings from Lanterman was the 2018 conviction of Stephen Allwine, who was discovered responsible of killing his spouse two years earlier after makes an attempt at hiring a hitman on the darkish web fell via. Allwine is serving a sentence of life in jail, and continues to take care of that he was framed, casting doubt on laptop forensic proof discovered on 64 digital gadgets taken from his house.
On March 24, Allwine petitioned a Minnesota courtroom (PDF) to revisit his case, citing the accusations towards Lanterman and his function as a key witness for the prosecution.
