America’s cybersecurity spine is going through a certain quantity of pressure.
The appearing head of the nation’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Safety Company, Madhu Gottumukkala, took steps final week to take away the company’s chief info officer, Robert Costello — however was blocked after different political appointees on the division objected, in line with three officers with information of the matter.
The Jan. 18 report by Politico, reveals this comes at a tense second for CISA, because the company works to defend federal networks and demanding infrastructure from persistent threats whereas navigating a wave of inner turnover and heightened scrutiny of management selections.
The transfer additionally provides to rising considerations contained in the company about decision-making by Gottumukkala, who has already confronted inner criticism in current weeks over different personnel actions.
CISA is a part of the Division of Homeland Safety and performs a central position in coordinating the federal authorities’s cyber protection posture, together with incident response assist, menace evaluation, and broader coordination with state and native companions in addition to the personal sector. Management turmoil on the prime of the company can have ripple results throughout DHS operations, notably when it includes core operational roles just like the CIO.
How the reassignment unfolded
The personnel dispute started late Thursday (Jan. 15) afternoon, when Costello was knowledgeable he had been given a so-called management-directed reassignment, the three officers mentioned. Below that course of, Costello was given about one week to resolve whether or not to maneuver to a different a part of DHS — or resign.
All three officers had been granted anonymity as a result of they feared retaliation for discussing inner company developments.
Administration-directed reassignments are usually used to maneuver senior workers to different roles or models with no formal termination course of. However in follow, officers mentioned, such actions are sometimes understood as forcing an worker out of their present place, notably when the shift is abrupt and the worker is just not supplied a transparent various position in the identical chain of command.
On this case, officers mentioned, the transfer shocked not solely profession workers but in addition different senior political appointees.
Political pushback halts the trouble
Different senior political appointees at DHS, together with Nick Anderson, CISA’s government assistant director for cybersecurity, weren’t knowledgeable forward of time concerning the resolution and objected sharply after they discovered about it, the officers mentioned.
They instantly “raised hell” and questioned the justification for Costello’s shock ejection from the company, mentioned the primary of the three officers.
The inner pushback prompted DHS headquarters to pause the reassignment and finally cease it fully earlier than the tip of the day Friday, in line with all three officers.
The episode highlighted how unusually contentious the transfer was, officers mentioned. Eradicating a CIO throughout a interval of staffing instability can disrupt enterprise expertise planning, cloud migration efforts, community safety packages, and day-to-day operations that assist cyber protection work.
CISA’s official response
In an announcement, CISA’s Director for Public Affairs Marci McCarthy mentioned that whereas CISA doesn’t touch upon particular personnel selections or discussions, the company “can make clear that senior personnel selections are made on the highest ranges on the Division of Homeland Safety’s Headquarters and are usually not made in a vacuum, independently by one particular person, or on a whim.”
She added: “CISA stays dedicated to transparency, accountability, and the very best requirements of management inside our group. We discourage reporting primarily based on inaccurate or incomplete info offered by disgruntled people at CISA who’re upset that accountability and reform have come to the company.”
The assertion appeared geared toward reinforcing that DHS headquarters maintains oversight of main staffing actions, and at framing inner criticism as resistance to reform fairly than considerations about management judgment.
Nonetheless, the three officers described the tried reassignment as sudden and poorly coordinated, growing nervousness amongst workers concerning the stability of senior management roles.
Questions surrounding Gottumukkala’s management
Every of the three officers mentioned that Gottumukkala instantly accredited the transfer. His motivations aren’t fully clear, and Gottumukkala didn’t reply to a request for remark.
The tried CIO ouster comes as Gottumukkala has already confronted scrutiny contained in the company following his dealing with of a failed polygraph examination in July, as Politico beforehand reported. Not less than six profession workers concerned in scheduling the check had been suspended with pay afterward, which DHS described as an “unsanctioned” examination.
Officers conversant in inner discussions mentioned that the suspensions rattled each profession workers and political appointees, partly as a result of the scenario raised questions on how personnel self-discipline was being utilized and whether or not decision-making processes had been being adopted persistently.
The Costello reassignment effort, though it was stopped, added to that uncertainty, officers mentioned, as a result of it prompt that different senior leaders might additionally face sudden removing with out clear justification or warning.
Tensions over coverage and contracting
The second and third officers mentioned there had been friction between Costello and Gottumukkala, notably as a result of Costello incessantly pushed again on coverage issues.
The primary and second officers additionally cited disagreements over contracting selections at CISA — a significant space of duty given the company’s heavy reliance on vendor partnerships for cybersecurity instruments, enterprise IT platforms, and operational assist.
Disputes over contracting can carry outsized significance inside federal companies, as they have an effect on each mission execution and spending priorities. Officers mentioned Costello was seen internally as an skilled chief with a fame for integrity, and all three praised his efficiency.
A former senior DHS official conversant in the fallout at CISA final week mentioned the trouble to take away Costello alarmed workers as a result of he’s seen as one of many company’s remaining prime technical skills.
That concern has develop into extra pronounced because the company’s workforce has shrunk considerably. Roughly 1,000 individuals — about one third of CISA’s workers — have left within the final 12 months as a result of Trump administration’s workforce cuts, the previous official mentioned.
Proper now, “the worry is excessive at CISA,” that former official mentioned. “It’s insane.”
Costello, Anderson, and Gottumukkala didn’t reply to requests for remark.
CISA and worldwide companions issued new steerage on securing AI in operational expertise, warning of OT dangers and urging stronger governance and safeguards.
