The variety of Bitcoin (BTC) nodes signaling assist for Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal 110 (BIP-110), a short lived gentle fork limiting the quantity of information included in every transaction on the consensus stage, rose to 2.38%.
583 out of 24,481 nodes are operating BIP-110, and the first node software program implementation for operating the gentle fork proposal is Bitcoin Knots, in accordance to The Bitcoin Portal.
BIP-110 limits the scale of transaction outputs to 34 bytes and caps the OP_RETURN knowledge restrict to 83 bytes. The non permanent gentle fork might be deployed for 1 12 months, with doable extension or alteration after the 1-year time period, in line with the proposal’s GitHub web page.
OP_RETURN is a script code that permits customers to embed arbitrary knowledge and has been the topic of intense debate inside the Bitcoin neighborhood following the discharge of Bitcoin Core model 30, the newest improve of probably the most broadly used Bitcoin node software program.
The OP_RETURN restrict was capped at 83 bytes, which Bitcoin Core builders unilaterally eliminated in Bitcoin Core model 30, following a controversial pull request, first proposed in April 2025. The proposal was typically opposed by the Bitcoin neighborhood.
Associated: Bitcoiners reject quantum computing fears as explanation for worth stoop
The arbitrary knowledge subject creates a divide inside the Bitcoin neighborhood
The Bitcoin Core replace that eliminated the info restrict went reside in October 2025, sparking a torrent of adverse suggestions from critics, who say that eradicating the arbitrary knowledge restrict incentivizes spam on the Bitcoin ledger.
Arbitrary knowledge will increase the storage prices of operating a Bitcoin node, and the prohibitive price results in elevated centralization of the Bitcoin community.
Bitcoin nodes might be run on consumer-grade computer systems, not like high-throughput blockchains that generate giant portions of information and require specialised {hardware}.
Rising node {hardware} necessities undermines the Bitcoin protocol’s worth proposition of being a decentralized financial community, in line with critics. Bitcoin advocate and educator Matthew Kratter mentioned:
“It is like a type of parasitical vegetation, like ivy, utterly overlaying a tree, consuming up the tree, after which the internal scaffolding collapses, and the ivy collapses as a result of it is mainly destroyed the construction. That is what spam has the potential to do to Bitcoin.”
Others like Jameson Lopp, a Bitcoin Core contributor, assist the uncapped OP_Return Restrict, arguing that filters do little to cease spam on the community.
Journal: Large questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year energy outage?
