TL;DR:
Fragmented AI instruments are draining budgets, slowing adoption, and irritating groups. To manage prices and speed up ROI, AI leaders want interoperable options that scale back instrument sprawl and streamline workflows.
AI funding is beneath a microscope in 2025. Leaders aren’t simply requested to show AI’s worth — they’re being requested why, after vital investments, their groups nonetheless wrestle to ship outcomes.
1-in-4 groups report issue implementing AI instruments, and practically 30% cite integration and workflow inefficiencies as their high frustration, in keeping with our Unmet AI Wants report.
The wrongdoer? A disconnected AI ecosystem. When groups spend extra time wrestling with disconnected instruments than delivering outcomes, AI leaders danger ballooning prices, stalled ROI, and excessive expertise turnover.
AI practitioners spend extra time sustaining instruments than fixing enterprise issues. The largest blockers? Guide pipelines, instrument fragmentation, and connectivity roadblocks.
Think about if cooking a single dish required utilizing a unique range each single time. Now envision operating a restaurant beneath these situations. Scaling can be unattainable.
Equally, AI practitioners are slowed down by the time-consuming, brittle pipelines, leaving much less time to advance and ship AI options.
AI integration should accommodate various working kinds, whether or not code-first in notebooks, GUI-driven, or a hybrid strategy. It should additionally bridge gaps between groups, comparable to information science and DevOps, the place every group depends on totally different toolsets. When these workflows stay siloed, collaboration slows, and deployment bottlenecks emerge.
Scalable AI additionally calls for deployment flexibility comparable to JAR recordsdata, scoring code, APIs or embedded functions. With out an infrastructure that streamlines these workflows, AI leaders danger stalled innovation, rising inefficiencies, and unrealized AI potential.
How integration gaps drain AI budgets and sources
Interoperability hurdles don’t simply decelerate groups – they create vital value implications.
The highest workflow restrictions AI practitioners face:
- Guide pipelines. Tedious setup and upkeep pull AI, engineering, DevOps, and IT groups away from innovation and new AI deployments.
- Software and infrastructure fragmentation. Disconnected environments create bottlenecks and inference latency, forcing groups into limitless troubleshooting as an alternative of scaling AI.
- Orchestration complexities. Guide provisioning of compute sources — configuring servers, DevOps settings, and adjusting as utilization scales — just isn’t solely time-consuming however practically unattainable to optimize manually. This results in efficiency limitations, wasted effort, and underutilized compute, in the end stopping AI from scaling successfully.
- Troublesome updates. Fragile pipelines and power silos make integrating new applied sciences gradual, complicated, and unreliable.
The long-term value? Heavy infrastructure administration overhead that eats into ROI.
Extra finances goes towards the overhead prices of guide patchwork options as an alternative of delivering outcomes.
Over time, these course of breakdowns lock organizations into outdated infrastructure, frustrate AI groups, and stall enterprise influence.
Code-first builders choose customization, however know-how misalignment makes it tougher to work effectively.
- 42% of builders say customization improves AI workflows.
- Just one-in-3 say their AI instruments are simple to make use of.
This disconnect forces groups to decide on between flexibility and value, resulting in misalignments that gradual AI improvement and complicate workflows. However these inefficiencies don’t cease with builders. AI integration points have a wider influence on the enterprise.
The true value of integration bottlenecks
Disjointed AI instruments and programs don’t simply influence budgets; they create ripple results that influence workforce stability and operations.
- The human value. With a mean tenure of simply 11 months, information scientists usually depart earlier than organizations can totally profit from their experience. Irritating workflows and disconnected instruments contribute to excessive turnover.
- Misplaced collaboration alternatives. Solely 26% of AI practitioners really feel assured counting on their very own experience, making cross-functional collaboration important for knowledge-sharing and retention.
Siloed infrastructure slows AI adoption. Leaders usually flip to hyperscalers for value financial savings, however these options don’t at all times combine simply with instruments, including backend friction for AI groups.
Generative AI and agentic are including extra complexity
With 90% of respondents anticipating generative AI and predictive AI to converge, AI groups should steadiness person wants with technical feasibility.
As King’s Hawaiian CDAO Ray Fager explains:
“Utilizing generative AI in tandem with predictive AI has actually helped us construct belief. Enterprise customers ‘get’ generative AI since they will simply work together with it. Once they have a GenAI app that helps them work together with predictive AI, it’s a lot simpler to construct a shared understanding.”
With an rising demand for generative and agentic AI, practitioners face mounting compute, scalability, and operational challenges. Many organizations are layering new generative AI instruments on high of their present know-how stack and not using a clear integration and orchestration technique.
The addition of generative and agentic AI, with out the inspiration to effectively allocate these complicated workloads throughout all obtainable compute sources, will increase operational pressure and makes AI even tougher to scale.
4 steps to simplify AI infrastructure and reduce prices
Streamlining AI operations doesn’t should be overwhelming. Listed here are actionable steps AI leaders can take to optimize operations and empower their groups:
Step 1: Assess instrument flexibility and adaptableness
Agentic AI requires modular, interoperable instruments that assist frictionless upgrades and integrations. As necessities evolve, AI workflows ought to stay versatile, not constrained by vendor lock-in or inflexible instruments and architectures.
Two essential inquiries to ask are:
- Can AI groups simply join, handle, and interchange instruments comparable to LLMs, vector databases, or orchestration and safety layers with out downtime or main reengineering?
- Do our AI instruments scale throughout varied environments (on-prem, cloud, hybrid), or are they locked into particular distributors and inflexible infrastructure?
Step 2: Leverage a hybrid interface
53% of practitioners choose a hybrid AI interface that blends the flexibleness of coding with the accessibility of GUI-based instruments. As one information science lead defined, “GUI is important for explainability, particularly for constructing belief between technical and non-technical stakeholders.”
Step 3: Streamline workflows with AI platforms
Consolidating instruments into a unified platform reduces guide pipeline stitching, eliminates blockers, and improves scalability. A platform strategy additionally optimizes AI workflow orchestration by leveraging the most effective obtainable compute sources, minimizing infrastructure overhead whereas guaranteeing low-latency, high-performance AI options.
Step 4: Foster cross-functional collaboration
When IT, information science, and enterprise groups align early, they will determine workflow obstacles earlier than they grow to be implementation roadblocks. Utilizing unified instruments and shared programs reduces redundancy, automates processes, and accelerates AI adoption.
Set the stage for future AI innovation
The Unmet AI Wants survey makes one factor clear: AI leaders should prioritize adaptable, interoperable instruments — or danger falling behind.
Inflexible, siloed programs not solely slows innovation and delays ROI, it additionally prevents organizations from responding to fast-moving developments in AI and enterprise know-how.
With 77% of organizations already experimenting with generative and predictive AI, unresolved integration challenges will solely grow to be extra expensive over time.
Leaders who deal with instrument sprawl and infrastructure inefficiencies now will decrease operational prices, optimize sources, and see stronger long-term AI returns
Get the complete DataRobot Unmet AI Wants report to find out how high AI groups are overcoming implementation hurdles and optimizing their AI investments.
