Throughout the globe, it stays widespread for crypto customers to have their financial institution accounts frozen and transfers blocked, whilst institutional adoption rises.
Panos Mekras, co-founder and CEO of blockchain fintech Anodos Labs, started coping with crypto in Greece within the late 2010s. Most Greek banks didn’t enable transfers to crypto exchanges again then. Mekras skilled blocked card funds till one financial institution lastly permitted his transfers, however first, he was questioned to make sure he understood he was interacting with a “dangerous” counterparty.
Mekras advised Cointelegraph that these early rejections are symptomatic of how banks deal with digital property as inherently excessive danger. That label typically led to account closures or sudden freezes with out rationalization, in the end pushing his enterprise to rely solely on onchain instruments and cost rails.
Public notion of crypto has since developed. Now, crypto is present process a picture refresh, from a speculative asset class to an infrastructure layer for future monetary merchandise. Nonetheless, Mekras mentioned he nonetheless experiences the identical banking boundaries, as lately as a “few months in the past”:
“I attempted to ship cash from an change to Revolut, they usually froze my account for 3 weeks. I had no entry to my [funds] throughout that point.”
The lengthy shadow of crypto debanking
Mekras isn’t the lone crypto holder with such complaints regardless of banks saying expansions into custody and blockchain initiatives.
A January report from the UK Cryptoasset Enterprise Council discovered that financial institution transfers to exchanges have been being blocked or delayed, with roughly 40% of funds encountering restrictions and 80% of exchanges reporting elevated friction over the previous 12 months.
The council warned that blanket bans and transaction limits are sometimes utilized with out regard to the authorized standing of the change.
Revolut is one in all two banks that allow each financial institution transfers and debit playing cards within the UK council’s examine, and it is usually the platform the place Mekras claims to have skilled his latest account freeze. It operates as a licensed UK financial institution “with restrictions,” which means it’s at the moment increase its banking processes earlier than full launch. It additionally holds a European Union banking license via Lithuania and gives crypto buying and selling companies in its app.
A Revolut spokesperson advised Cointelegraph it treats account freezes as a “last-resort” buyer safety measure in compliance with Anti-Cash Laundering (AML) and Know Your Buyer (KYC) laws.
“A short lived freeze might happen if our techniques detect irregular exercise. This might be a mixture of some components, similar to if a buyer interacts with a platform ceaselessly exploited by fraudsters, or we imagine that the funds in query would be the proceeds of crime or sanctions circumvention,” the spokesperson mentioned.
The consultant added that since Oct. 1, simply 0.7% of Revolut accounts the place prospects deposited crypto funds have been restricted or frozen after investigation.
Associated: How Europe’s blockchain sandbox finds innovation in regulation
When banks shut doorways, customers transfer onchain
In some areas, crypto is blocked and leaves customers to extra excessive restrictions. Crypto on- and off-ramps will not be legally doable in areas like China, so customers resort to peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms or black markets to commerce crypto.
Whereas China sits on the intense finish of the spectrum, different jurisdictions have eased official and unofficial restrictions. Nigeria as soon as banned crypto and even blocked P2P platforms. Nonetheless, it formally acknowledged digital property as securities in 2025.
Associated: Crypto takeaways from Davos: Politics and cash collide
Related banking friction patterns additionally emerged within the US. Lawmakers and the business have invoked the time period “Operation Chokepoint 2.0” to explain the federal regulators’ casual steerage that discouraged banks from sustaining relationships with crypto firms.
The unique “Operation Choke Level” was an initiative wherein enforcement companies have been accused of pressuring banks to chop ties with politically contentious industries similar to payday lenders and firearms sellers.
In January 2025, Donald Trump took workplace because the president of the US and has been pushing for crypto-friendly insurance policies to place the world’s largest economic system because the “crypto capital” of the world.
Crypto debanking points have since been formally acknowledged. In December, the US Workplace of the Comptroller of the Foreign money (OCC) launched its findings on debanking practices by 9 of the nation’s largest banks. The OCC additionally printed an interpretive letter to verify that banks might facilitate crypto transactions in a broker-like capability.
Whatever the constructive momentum, customers nonetheless complain that the banking sector gained’t service accounts uncovered to cryptocurrencies.
“That is nonetheless the case [and] there are nonetheless anti-crypto positions. Some have even mentioned publicly that they aren’t keen to help crypto exercise or interact with the business,” mentioned Mekras.
Mekras argued that customers can think about totally detaching from the normal banking system and transferring funds onchain. It sounds viable in idea, however in actuality, most companies and customers nonetheless can not function purely inside crypto with out dependable entry to fiat rails.
Banking’s flip towards blockchain infrastructure
In recent times, there was a worldwide shift in how conventional monetary establishments interact with crypto.
Main banks and monetary infrastructures are more and more constructing services and products tied to Web3. Within the US, 60% of the highest 25 banks are reportedly providing or planning Bitcoin-related companies, together with custody, buying and selling and advisory options.
Throughout Europe, regulated companies similar to crypto custody and settlement are being launched by legacy exchanges and monetary teams beneath the Markets in Crypto-Belongings Rules (MiCA). Within the UK, HSBC’s blockchain platform was chosen to help pilot issuances of tokenized authorities bonds.
In that backdrop of institutional adoption, some firms working to bridge banks and blockchain declare that the challenges that result in account freezes are linked to tooling gaps and danger frameworks inside banks.
“The issue is that there’s an enormous quantity of friction as a result of conventional banks don’t actually have the interior infrastructure to interpret blockchain knowledge in a means that matches inside their current danger and compliance frameworks,” Eyal Daskal, CEO of Crymbo — a blockchain infrastructure platform for establishments — advised Cointelegraph.
He described the scenario as one the place banks typically default to precautionary measures as a result of they lack the flexibility to hyperlink onchain exercise with the id and compliance alerts they depend on:
“If crypto is concerned, they block the account and deal with it as out of scope. It’s the only choice for them as a result of they don’t have the instruments to evaluate it correctly.”
Crypto is coming into the monetary mainstream, however for a lot of customers, entry to primary banking nonetheless relies on whether or not a financial institution’s danger engine can perceive what occurs onchain. Till that hole closes, the business’s institutional embrace and retail friction might proceed to coexist.
Journal: Bitcoin might take 7 years to improve to post-quantum: BIP-360 co-author
Cointelegraph Options and Cointelegraph Journal publish long-form journalism, evaluation and narrative reporting produced by Cointelegraph’s in-house editorial crew and chosen exterior contributors with subject-matter experience. All articles are edited and reviewed by Cointelegraph editors in keeping with our editorial requirements. Contributions from exterior writers are commissioned for his or her expertise, analysis or perspective and don’t replicate the views of Cointelegraph as an organization except explicitly said. Content material printed in Options and Journal doesn’t represent monetary, authorized or funding recommendation. Readers ought to conduct their very own analysis and seek the advice of certified professionals the place applicable. Cointelegraph maintains full editorial independence. The choice, commissioning and publication of Options and Journal content material will not be influenced by advertisers, companions or business relationships.
