What’s up, guys! I’m publishing one more evalution of the ten greatest EAs. This time it’s the choice TOP 10, that isn’t locations 1 to 10, however 101 to 110. Sure! Why? I assumed perhaps there are EAs that the purchasers do not see, however they need to be common.
In case you care, final time I made an analysis of the TOP 10 FREE EAs.
Nicely, I discovered a very good EA!! That’s excellent news. The dangerous factor about this excellent news is that it already has a detrimental assessment. Who is aware of, perhaps there are extra EAs like that. Greatest concepts are killed on the very begin… I’ll certainly return to this one EA 1-2 months later. Often, the EAs with dangerous opinions are usually not improved, nor up to date any extra. So I can run its true historic check in a couple of months and make sure my analysis or discard it!
101/ Golden Phantom dangerous
102/ Prometheus AI Gold dangerous
103/ Development Guardian dangerous
104/ Gold ISIS MT5 dangerous
105/ CrossPair Spiral dangerous
106/ King of Foreign exchange EA good
107/ QuantCore GT dangerous
108/ Restoration Supervisor Professional MT5 dangerous
109/ Hamster Scalping mt5 dangerous
110/ PipSpial dangerous
101/ Golden Phantom
Printed Might 2025, no updates but
10 opinions (approx. 100 whole purchases)
Max income of the creator approx. 45K USD
Execs:
– Trades the risky Gold.
Cons:
– Solely makes buys.
– Default danger 200, that’s 0.02 for 1000 USD deposit. Will certainly kill the account when Gold checks its help ranges one after the other.
Conclusion: It made 300 buys and three sells in its historic check since 2023. That is kindda ridiculous for the M15 timeframe that the creator recommends. Seems to be just like the creator sells one other product that bets on the ever-growing Gold.
102/ Prometheus AI Gold
Printed August 2024, final replace Might 2025
6 opinions (approx. 60 whole purchases)
Max income of the creator approx. 69K USD
Execs:
– Trades the risky Gold.
Cons:
– Expects very small positive factors and makes use of a big stoploss to chop unsuitable entries, and it does hit the stoploss.
– A bunch of various indicators as inputs, all with contradicting values. No clarification of the technique.
Conclusion: Very correct entries within the historical past for the 15M timeframe. That is kindda suspicious for the risky Gold.
103/ Development Guardian
Printed February 2025, final replace April 2025
6 opinions (approx. 60 whole purchases)
Max income of the creator approx. 16K USD
Execs:
– Trades the risky Gold.
Cons:
– No indication, what timeframe it makes use of.
– Very dangerous historic check any 12 months earlier than 2023.
Conclusion: It has a believable historic chart since 2023. However any 12 months earlier than 2023 goes easy downwards. By no means noticed that earlier than. The longer term is any costs, and the technique has to have the ability to make new selections in new market circumstances. Nicely, the previous can also be any costs, so why does your technique fail in anybody 12 months earlier than 2023?
104/ Gold ISIS MT5
Printed February 2025, final replace March 2025
12 opinions (approx. 120 whole purchases)
Max income of the creator approx. 53K USD
Execs:
– Trades the risky Gold.
Cons:
– A really uneven historical past because the final replace in March, fast ups and downs.
Conclusion: The creator recommends the M15 timeframe for Gold… No means. It makes use of a easy breakout from the M15 resistence ranges. Sure, it could work, but it surely will not make a revenue with a correct cash administration. The best way it trades, it has a really uneven buying and selling – very fast ups and downs because the final replace.
105/ CrossPair Spiral
Printed April 2025, final replace April 2025
3 opinions (approx. 30 whole purchases)
Max income of the creator approx. 3K USD
Execs:
– ??
Cons:
– A really sluggish historic check, even a couple of months on OHLC costs. And no clarification to this.
– No buying and selling in any respect in historic checks because the final replace in April. And no clarification both.
Conclusion: I used to be all the time scared by very sluggish methods. The factor is, programming is tough. You need to discover ways to optimize the code. If the creator can not optimize the code, it means they make their first steps in coding. Only a few trades within the sign, and no buying and selling in Might for the three symbols.
106/ King of Foreign exchange EA
Printed Might 2025, final replace Might 2025
1 assessment (approx. 10 whole purchases)
Max income of the creator approx. 1K USD
Execs:
– Can commerce a number of symbols.
– Can commerce a number of timeframes.
– Does have a believable historic chart.
Cons:
– No distinct clarification of the technique.
– No reason why it trades properly on totally different timeframes and totally different symbols. What timeframe was it designed for?
Conclusion: I’m happy to announce I’ve discovered a very good technique! Sadly, it has one detrimental assessment (and no different opinions). This implies the creator won’t be able to promote it to anybody else, and most likely is not going to proceed bettering this technique.
107/ QuantCore GT
Printed March 2025, no updates but
11 opinions (approx. 110 whole purchases)
Max income of the creator approx. 58K USD
Execs:
– Trades the risky Gold.
Cons:
– Small positive factors to be ceaselessly offset by bigger stoplosses.
– Improper cash administration.
– Very uneven historic chart because the publish date in March, and no updates. And no revenue.
Conclusion: Dangerous. Even its historic check is dangerous.
108/ Restoration Supervisor Professional MT5
Printed December 2023, final replace January 2025
7 opinions (approx. 70 whole purchases)
Max income of the creator approx. 12K USD
Execs:
– ??
Cons:
– Doesn’t commerce.
– Interferes within the work of different EAs.
Conclusion: The thought is to recuperate the floating detrimental income from different EAs. What it does within the first place… it disables the EA that’s at the moment making a drawdown… Bro?! The EA you might be disabling, is not it imagined to recuperate its positions utilizing its native algorithm? A scalper merely opens different trades in the identical route, and it does recuperate fairly often. However your EA will change it off, so what restoration are you speaking about? Another restoration?
109/ Hamster Scalping mt5
Printed January 2018, final replace June 2024
259 opinions (approx. 2590 whole purchases)
Max income of the creator approx. 69K USD
Execs:
– A scalping technique, that has not too long ago develop into a promising route in Foreign currency trading.
Cons:
– Too many enter values. You merely don’t perceive what to optimize.
– Any set for any image doesn’t survive because the final replace in June 2024.
– Improper cash administration.
Conclusion: It has accrued many good opinions as a result of it’s a scalping technique. It has not too long ago turned out that scalping methods, particularly, on H1 timeframe are the one promising route on Foreign exchange. Developments are uncommon. Flat vary is sort of fixed – make the most of that! Nevertheless, the creator neglects primary ideas for a scalper, so even a false pattern (!) blows out the account.
110/ PipSpial
Printed April 2025, final replace April 2025
7 opinions (approx. 70 whole purchases)
Max income of the creator approx. 7K USD
Execs:
– ??
Cons:
– A really sluggish historic check, even a couple of months on OHLC costs. And no clarification to this.
– No indication what timeframe it makes use of.
– I ran a GBPUSD check in Might. It made one purchase. That doesn’t match the sign historical past – 2 sells for GBPUSD.
Conclusion: Like the opposite EA from this creator (CrossPair Spiral), it’s testing very slowly. This makes me assume the creator is a newbie in MQL5 programming. The sign historical past for this EA doesn’t match the historic check.
